I’ve noticed a problem in the basic structure of flat Earth argumentation and globe Earth’s responses

0
I’ve noticed a problem in the basic structure of flat Earth argumentation and globe Earth’s responses

Some flat Earth arguments do not follow logic, they are just simple ideas, or singular, scientificly seeming words thrown at the non-flat Earth side.

Examples:

-perspective

-magmetism

-coriolis effect

-density

-reinforced steel dome

Do you even think about it, or just say these things randomly?

The worst thing is, in some cases an alternative model actually exists, for example, explaining the Earth’s curvature observation when it is in reality a flat surface. Just limit the speed of photons, or give them mass. This still doesn’t make much sense in the long run, but at least theoretically, it is possible.

Please, do some math, check the stuff you read.

In the other hand, the globe Earthers often base their responses off “you are stupid” argument. Insulting eachother doesn’t help when you are trying to convince the other person to belive you.

I believe the Earth is round because I’ve seen proof of it.

Always search for the truth.

submitted by /u/Entity904
[link] [comments]